<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://dspace.ewubd.edu:8080/handle/123456789/4824">
<title>Vol. 14, 2026</title>
<link>http://dspace.ewubd.edu:8080/handle/123456789/4824</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.ewubd.edu:8080/handle/123456789/4826"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dspace.ewubd.edu:8080/handle/123456789/4825"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-05-30T11:14:28Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://dspace.ewubd.edu:8080/handle/123456789/4826">
<title>The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Business Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review</title>
<link>http://dspace.ewubd.edu:8080/handle/123456789/4826</link>
<description>The Role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Business Transformation: A Systematic Literature Review
Niroula, Narayan; Sharma, Gajendra
Conventional Computer systems helped digitalize the business, but they did not&#13;
address all business bottlenecks. AI-powered systems offered better automated&#13;
business services than traditional computer systems, saving time and cost. While the&#13;
huge shift in business processes was beneficial, it also led to misunderstandings, such&#13;
as rumors of a threat to jobs and humanity. Such information was flooding blogs,&#13;
vlogs, podcasts, and news media, creating confusion among regular technology&#13;
users. In this backdrop, this study aims to explore whether AI-driven systems have&#13;
really assisted in transforming modern business, or whether it is a subject of&#13;
misconceptions and rumors due to its magical capabilities. This study adopts&#13;
PRISMA guidelines to review 120 articles from 2020 to 2026. This research&#13;
addresses the question: How do AI-powered systems help transform modern business&#13;
processes? Themes were generated from 16 business domains. The study identified&#13;
four themes from reviews :(1) Operational Automation, (2) Data-Driven Decision&#13;
Making, (3) Customer Experience and Personalization, and (4) Innovation in Product&#13;
and Service Delivery. This study revealed that AI-driven tools have greatly improved&#13;
business processes. The misconceptions and rumors arose from exaggerated&#13;
statements in various new media and grey literature. By highlighting the AI’s&#13;
contribution to transforming business practices, this research sought to clarify&#13;
whether the benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
</description>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dspace.ewubd.edu:8080/handle/123456789/4825">
<title>Knowledge and Attitudes toward Education Board Directions during COVID-19: Evidence from Higher Secondary Students</title>
<link>http://dspace.ewubd.edu:8080/handle/123456789/4825</link>
<description>Knowledge and Attitudes toward Education Board Directions during COVID-19: Evidence from Higher Secondary Students
Sattar, Md. Abdus
Due to the impacts of COVID-19 on education worldwide, Bangladesh implemented a range of  educational  management  measures,  including  online  classes,  television  education programs, and teacher training in digital literacy. Students' perceptions in higher secondary education are important for evaluating the efficiency and resilience of education systems. To assess  higher  secondary  students’  knowledge  of  education  board  directions  and  their attitudes  toward  their  implementation,  a  cross-sectional  survey  was  conducted  after  the COVID-19-related interventions ended. Knowledge was assessed through multiple-response items  while  attitudes  were  measured  on  a  5-point  Likert  scale.  Descriptive  statistics (frequencies, means, SD) were used for analysis. Additionally, subgroup analyses (χ², t-tests, ANOVA) were conducted to examine whether knowledge and attitudes differed by sex, district, area of residence, and type of college. Knowledge was highest for directives on Google  Meet-based  classes  (82.05%),  attendance  monitoring  (74.10%),  and  awareness creation  (71.28%).  Awareness  of  reporting  absenteeism  (37.17%)  and  observing  non-attendance  (26.41%)  was  relatively  low.  Attitudes  were  mixed:  students  acknowledged college initiatives (M = 3.35, SD = 1.12) and teacher monitoring (M = 3.15, SD = 1.07) but reported low engagement and interest (M = 2.40–2.78). The overall mean attitude was M = 2.91 (SD = 1.39). According to the statistical test, there were no significant differences between  males  and  females,  but  differences  were  found  in  attitudes  toward  attention, engagement,  and  monotony.  Both  knowledge  awareness  and  attitudes  toward  teachers’ monitoring and institutional initiatives varied significantly by district, area of residence, and type of college. Although the students were aware of the structural instructions, they reported lower satisfaction with engagement and motivation. Maintaining the continuity and quality of education, teachers’ training, consistent monitoring, and digital equity should be included in policies for managing future crises in the education sector.
</description>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
