EWU Institutional Repository

The Impact of Judicial Questioning on Witness Credibility and Case Outcomes

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Chowdhury, Imtiaz Ahmed
dc.date.accessioned 2024-02-15T04:39:03Z
dc.date.available 2024-02-15T04:39:03Z
dc.date.issued 2023-12-27
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.ewubd.edu:8080/handle/123456789/4257
dc.description This thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Law in East West University, Dhaka, Bangladesh en_US
dc.description.abstract In our legal system, the range of questions that judges can ask is restricted. Our legal proceedings are impacted by a judicial inquiry. It is imperative to guarantee that competent witnesses are questioned by the judges. This study attempts to assess the significance of the witness's credibility and the judicial interrogation. Witness credibility and case results are impacted by the questions asked by judges. The qualitative approach used in this study was based on both primary and secondary data. The study intends to determine the weaknesses in our legal system's judicial interrogation practices as well as assess the credibility of witnesses in Bangladeshi and foreign courts. Our legal system prohibits a judge from using his discretionary authority to interrogate a witness. To testify in court, witnesses must also possess sufficient credibility. We can improve the jury system or grant judge’s greater authority so they can interrogate witnesses in any instance. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher East West University en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries ;LAW00192
dc.subject Judicial Questioning on Witness Credibility and Case Outcomes en_US
dc.title The Impact of Judicial Questioning on Witness Credibility and Case Outcomes en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account